Seriously. Right now this forum is incredibly dominated by white, heterosexual men (arguably, the "heterosexual" part is debatable in a lot of cases ). We're basically stuck in our own little bubble of misogyny, racism and prog rock. I think it would be cool if the admins brought more blacks, females and faggots to this board. They don't necessarily have to be real; as long as the mods and admins play their parts well, and we don't find out that they're fake, who cares really? It might sound like a lot of work (and it is), but it's for a good cause. We need to stop this apartheid system that is constantly being reinforced on these forums.
didn't you already make a thread about this, the neat? black gays? though you posted it on the wrong forum
Black people? No, we say nigger too much. Women? No, every woman who posts here gets hit on by everyone and you all know you would put it in Sarah's butt. Homosexual posters? Yes please.
^there, i made a gay post, but gay as in homosexual and in a non-derogatory way and meaningful to what the OP wants
If one examines constructivism, one is faced with a choice: either accept cultural rationalism or conclude that narrative is created by the collective unconscious, given that constructivism is valid. Debord promotes the use of subconstructive dialectic theory to challenge archaic, sexist perceptions of reality. It could be said that the example of constructivism which is a central theme of Smith’s Chasing Amy emerges again in Clerks. “Class is unattainable,” says Derrida. Any number of constructions concerning cultural rationalism exist. Therefore, Werther[1] suggests that the works of Smith are reminiscent of Joyce. The main theme of the works of Smith is a self-fulfilling reality. However, the subject is interpolated into a constructivism that includes language as a totality. The primary theme of Brophy’s critique of presemanticist narrative is the role of the writer as participant. Thus, the subject is contextualised into a cultural rationalism that includes truth as a paradox. Bataille suggests the use of presemanticist narrative to read and analyse society. But the subject is interpolated into a cultural rationalism that includes culture as a whole. Several narratives concerning the failure, and hence the meaninglessness, of capitalist sexual identity may be found. It could be said that in Mallrats, Smith deconstructs constructivism; in Clerks, although, he reiterates cultural rationalism.
This is prime example of how niggers act. Why does anyone give people who act like this reprieve? This is deplorable behavior. What kind of person relishes in people being angry at them? It's idiotic. But this behavior is what dominates the environment in urban areas where blacks majoritize the population. This attitude perpetuates violence and anti-social tendencies. What the fuck is wrong with this country that we put up with this shit. Allow ignorant, useless malignant people like this to express themselves on public forums? I understand this is America, and we need to preserve constitutional rights, but I think there's a line that needs to be drawn in the sand and we need to make it clear that behavior like this is unacceptable. How are we, as a people supposed to progress beyond racism and intolerance when people like this are allowed to express themselves?! Well, the answer is; we're not. That's their objective. As long as people like this are allowed to speak their mind, then we don't progress. And that is what they want because they are comfortable where they are. They do NOTHING and have everything handed to them. No sense of responsibility or duty. If you wish to participate in society then you need to do your part, which at the very least is abandon ignorance and attitudes like this... I could go on, but I have to leave my home and go integrate into society in a way where people appreciate my existence instead of instigating negative values in people.
Everybody outside Africa has been stained with the same amount of Neanderthal blood brah. Roughly 4%.