I'd say the style of Facejacker's humor is actually quite American, considering it's a British program[me].
FUCK YESSSSSSSSSSSS WHERE CAN I BUY THESE AGAIN at every party i went to before my age ended in -teen i ate the entire party's supply of these in b4 thisiswhyyourefat.jpg
Then why is it logical to say twenty-one and not one and twenty? In Dutch and German, we use that system for tenths, from twenty-one onwards. With hundreds it goes like one hundred one and twenty, one hundred two and twenty, etc. I find that to be very illogical even though we're using that system for 13-19 {thirteen, fourteen, ...} in English, too. What about a year? You say nineteen-eighty-five, not eighty-five of nineteen-hundred (or of the twentieth century). I know that your argument makes sense in your example and ranks like first sergeant, second sergeant, etc. But, with royalties it's Henry III (Henry the Third), Henry IV (Henry the Fourth), etc.
Twat is worst when yanks say it. At least around here, they pronounce it twart, which completely ruins the strength of the word. Edit: Here being the Philadelphia area
It's officially spelt 'aitch', IIRC; but the pronounciation is allowed to vary between 'aitch' and 'haitch', as there are regional dialects within the UK itself where this is evident; much the same as dialects elsewhere pronounce words differently (though they remain the same word).
The British pharmacopeia has changed the spelling of "sulphur" to "sulfur," the bastards. Admittedly they're following European pharmacopeia, so they're clearly absolute cunts too
I don't understand why England/USA always argues over the spelling of words, English is one of the most retarded languages anyway.
Pretty much. The world would be a better place if an easier language was the dominant one, but hey, at least it's not Mandarin. Also, it puts food on my table, so I ain't hatin'.
