The user conservative is a nutjob idiot Christian who also happens to be responsible for the pages on topics such as evolution and Richard Dawkins Other users are actually complaining about his complete disregard for even a mild attempt at neutrality.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia And of course http://www.conservapedia.com/Theory_of_Relativity#Lack_of_evidence_for_Relativity I'm having a hard time thinking of what their alternative to relativity would be...are the detractors trying to say that Newtonian Mechanics should be used instead?
Holy shit on #11. David Wolpert is the guy who authored the statement of a theorem that Dembski based his book on.
Candidate Obama cultivated an image of sportsmanship and competition; as President, Obama ridiculed disabled people who compete in the Special Olympics. The comments "set us back decades," according to the program's director.
Ok, this has to be a joke: http://www.conservapedia.com/STD Oh, and: http://www.conservapedia.com/Gay_plague
http://www.conservapedia.com/Joseph_McCarthy Apparently I've seriously misjudged this man! http://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal There are no words. Of all the conservipedia articles I've read, this one is easily the most classic.
The death penalty and killing people is a good thing Having sex is a bad thing Wiretapping everybody is a good thing Sexism is a good thing Same sex marriage is a bad thing Teaching the theory of evolution is a bad thing (it's a fricking THEORY, for FSM's sake!) Everybody knows these things. Fuck liberals.
(cur) (prev) 18:03, 29 August 2007 Applemilk1984 (Talk | contribs) (Apparently the admins here are just as factually devoid as liberals. Atoms are not a fact, and they never will be. You have been indoctrinated by secular education. WHERE IN THE BIBLE DO YOU FIND ATOM)
Maybe if we cry together Maybe if we cry as one the tears that fall could kill the fire and keep everyone from Atom & Evil
God, this website is so addictive. I spent an hour browsing it today instead of studying for my finals
The density of fallacies in that comic is so great that it's on the verge of collapsing into an infinitely dense singularity of human stupidity.
This is actually a troll that was trying to mock their site by putting this in the article: Unfortunately, the admins figured out he was trolling, and banned him from editing. I wonder what part of articles is by fellows who decided to make the pages more funny, and were never caught? I guess we can help by making the site more laughable and less plausible.
Anyone want to help insert this line into the article of every black person on Conservepedia e.g. Clarence Thomas, Colin Powell, Jesus? Hell, it fits in just about every article there, so we could throw it in the article for Black Holes, Atoms, John McCain...
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_Uncharitableness http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_deception http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_Mass_Murder and my favorite: http://www.conservapedia.com/Causes_of_Atheism
While this site was created with the intent of being serious, I'm pretty sure 90% of the updates of the site are made as a joke/by trolls.
I just noticed that the comic sourced for atoms claims chemical evolution doesn't happen. That is, elements don't turn into other elements. Have they never stepped outside in their lives?
Are we holy LOLing the normal conservapedia stuff, or the fact that GuineaPig seems to be a proponent of Medieval alchemy? I'm probably just misunderstanding everyone's posts, as usual.
Okay, so I'm not the only one that is interpretting GuineaPig's post to be...well...incredibly inaccurate? I'm no chemistry expert, but I'm pretty sure that elements only change into other elements during nuclear fission or fusion, right?
That's the point. If we didn't have "chemical evolution", we wouldn't have the fucking sun. Also, there are a whole bunch of other processes. For example, UV radiation hitting N-14 turns it into C-14. Or alpha or beta decay. Or when being bombarded by particles. Point is, it absolutely does happen, and there's absolutely no way to deny it.